It is already mentioned that ingesting carbohydratebefore, during, and
following exercise can benefit performance by ensuring adequate fuel for energy
production during exercise and for replenishing glycogen stores following exercise. While selecting a wise diet can
provide for most of the athlete’s nutritional needs, nutritional supplements
can also be of great value. In addition, adequate fluid intake is necessary for
preexercise hydration, hydration during exercise, and rehydration following exercise. Sport drinks are uniquely designed
to meet both the energy and fluid needs of the athlete. Performance benefits
from these drinks have been clearly documented, not only in endurance
activities, but in burst activities as well.
Composition of sport drinks
Sport drinks differ from one another in a
number of ways besides in taste. Of major concern, however, is the rate at
which energy and water are delivered. Energy delivery is primarily determined
by the concentration of the carbohydrates
in the drink, and fluid replacementis
influenced by the sodium concentration of the drink.
Energy delivery – the carbohydrate
concentration
A major concern is how rapidly the drink leaves
the stomach, or the rate of gastric
emptying. In general, carbohydrate
solutions empty more slowly from the stomach than either water or a weak sodium
chloride(salt) solution. Research suggests that a solution’s caloric content, a
reflection of its concentration, might be a major determinant of how quickly it
empties from the stomach and is absorbed in the intestine. Since carbohydrate solutions, increasing the
glucose concentration of a sport drink significantly reduces the gastric
emptying rate. For example, 400 ml(14oz) of a weak glucose solution(139 mmol/L)
is almost completely emptied from the stomach in 20 min, but emptying a similar
volume of a strong glucose solution(834 mmol/L) can require nearly 2h. However,
when even a small amount of a strong glucose drink leaves the stomach, it can
contain more sugar than a larger amount of a weaker solution simply because of
its higher concentration. But, if an athlete is trying to prevent dehydration, this would deliver less
water and thus be counterproductive.
Most sport drinks on the market contain about 6
to 8g of carbohydrate per 100ml(
3.5oz) of fluid(6% to 8%). The carbohydrate source is generally glucose,
glucose polymers, or a combination of glucose and glucose polymers, although
fructose or sucrose has also been used. Research studies have confirmed
enhanced endurance performance with use of solutions in this range of
concentration and with these sources of carbohydrates
when compared to water. Carbohydrate
solutions above approximately 6% slow gastric emptying and limit the immediate
availability of fluid. However, they can provide a greater amount of carbohydrate in a given period of time
to meet the increased energy needs.
Rehydration with sport drinks – the sodium concentration
Just adding fluid to the body during exercise
lessens the risk of seriousdehydration.
But research indicates that adding glucose and sodium to sport drinks, aside
from supplying an energy source, stimulates both water and sodium absorption.
Sodium increases both thirst and palatability of the drink. Recall that when
sodium is retained, this causes more water to be retained. Forrehydration purposes, both during and
following exercise, the sodium concentration should range between 20 mmol/L and
60 mmol/L. There is an important loss of sodium from the body with sweating. With
high rates of sweating and large volumes of water intake, this can lead to critical reductions in the sodium concentration of
the blood and possibly lead to hyponatremia.
What works best?
Athletes will not drink solutions that taste
bad. Unfortunately, we all have different taste preferences. To further
confound the issue, what tastes good before and after a long, hot bout of
exercise will not necessarily taste good during the event. Studies of taste
preferences of runners and cyclists during 60 min of exercise showed that most
chose a drink with a light flavor and no strong aftertaste. But, will athletes
drink more if given a sport drink as compared to water? In one study, runners
ran on a treadmill for 90 min and then recovered while seated for an additional
90 min. Both exercise and recovery conditions were controlled in an
environmental chamber at a temperature of 32°C(86°F), 50% humidity. Three
trials were conducted, two with two different sport drinks(6% and 8% carbohydrate) and one with water.
Subjects were encouraged to drink throughout each trial. The volume consumed
during exercise was similar for all three drinks; but during recovery, the runners drunk about 55%
more of each of the two sport drinks than water.
In an effort to eat a healthy diet and increase
their carbohydrate intake, many athletes have adopted vegetarianism. Vegans are
strict vegetarians who eat only food from plant sources. Lactovegeterians also
consume dairy products. Ovovegeterians add eggs to their vegetable diets, and
lacto-ovovegeterians eat plant foods, dairy products, and eggs.
Can athletes perform well on a vegetarian diet?
Athletes who are strict vegans must be very careful in selecting the plant foods
they eat to provide a good balance of the essential amino acids, sufficient
calories, and adequate sources of vitamin A, riboflavin, vitamin B12, vitamin D, calcium, zync,
and iron. Adequate iron intake is of particular concern in
female vegetarian athletes because of the lower bioavailability of iron in
plant-based diets and because of women’s greater risk for anemia and low iron
stores. Some professional athletes have noted significant deterioration in
athletic performance after switching to strict vegetarian diets. The problem
usually is traced to unwise selection of foods. Including milk and eggs in the
diet decreases the risk of nutritional deficiencies. Anyone contemplating
switching to a vegetarian diet should either read authoritative material on the
subject written by qualified nutritionists or consult a registered dietitian or
sport nutritionist.
Precompetition meal
For years, many athletes have eaten the
traditional steak dinner several hours before competition. This practice might
have originated from the early belief that muscle consumes itself to fuel its
own activity and that steak would provide the necessary protein to counteract this loss. But we know that the steak is
probably the worst food an athlete could eat before competing. Steak contains a
relatively high percentage of fat,
which requires several hours for full digestion. During competition, this would
cause the digestive system to compete with the muscles for the availableblood supply. Also, nervous tension is
typically high before a big competition, so even the choicest steak cannot
truly be enjoyed at this time. The steak would be more satisfying and less
likely to disturb performance if the athlete were to eat it either the night
before or after the competition. But if steak is out, what should the athlete
eat before competing?
Although the meal ingested a few hours before
competition might contribute little to muscle glycogen stores, it can ensure a
normal blood glucose level and
prevent hunger. This meal should contain only about 200 to 500 kcal and consist
mostly of carbohydrate foods that are easily digested. Foods such as cereal,
milk, juice, and toast are digested rather quickly and won’t leave the athlete
feeling full during competition. In general, this meal should be consumed at
least 2h before competition. The rates at which food is digested and nutrients
are absorbed into the body are quite individual, so timing the precompetition
meal might depend on prior experience. In one study of endurance cyclists, a
prolonged cycling exercise trial to exhaustion at 70% of the subject’s VO2max
was performed under two different conditions, with 14 days between trials: 100g
of carbohydrate breakfast fed 3h
before exercise(Fed) and no feeding before exercise(Fasted). Subjects tested under
the Fed condition exercised 136 min before reaching exhaustion compared with
109 min in the fasted trial, indicating the importance of the precompetition
meal.
A liquid precompetition meal might be less
likely to result in nervous digestion, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramps.
Such feedings are commercially available and generally have been found useful
both before and between events. Finding time for athletes to eat is often
difficult when they must perform in multiple preliminary and final events.
Under these circumstances, a liquid feeding that is low in fat and high in carbohydrate
might be only solution.
Muscle glycogen replacement and loading
Earlier was established that different diets
can markedly influence muscle glycogen stores and that endurance performance
depends largely on these stores. The theory is that the greater the amount of
glycogen stored, the better the potential endurance performance because fatique will be delayed. Thus, an
athlete’s goal is to begin an exercise bout or competition with as much stored
glycogen as possible.
On the basis of muscle biopsy studies conducted
in the mid-1960s, Astrand proposed a plan to help runners store the maximum
amount ofglycogen. This process is
known as glycogen or carbohydrate loading. According to Astrand’s regimen,
athletes should prepare for an aerobic endurance competition by completing an
exhaustive training bout seven days before the event. For the next three days,
they should eat fat and proteinalmost exclusively to deprive
the muscles of carbohydrate, which increases the activity of glycogen synthase,
an enzyme responsible for glycogen synthesis and storage. Athletes should then
eat a carbohydrate-rich diet for the remaining three days before the event.
Because glycogen synthase activity is increased, increased carbohydrate intake results in greater muscle glycogen storage.
Training intensity and volume during this six-day period should be markedly
reduced to prevent additional muscle glycogen depletion, thus maximizing liver and muscle glycogen reserves. Originally,
an additional intense training bout was performed four days prior to
competition.
This regimen has been shown to elevate muscle
glycogen stores to twice the normal level, but it is somewhat impractical for
most highly trained competitors. During the three days of low carbohydrate intake, athletes generally find training difficult. They are also often
irritable and unable to perform mental tasks, and they typically show signs of
low blood sugar, such as muscle weakness and disorientation. In addition,
the exhaustive depletion bouts of exercise performed seven days before the
competition have little training value and can impair glycogen storage rather
than enhance it. This depletion exercise also exposes athletes to possible
injury or overtraining.
Considering these limitations, many proposed
that the depletion exercise and the low carbohydrate aspects of Astrand’s
regimen be eliminated. Instead, according to Sherman and colleagues, the
athlete should simply reduce training intensity a week before competition and
eat a normal, mixed diet containing 55% of the calories from thecarbohydrate until three days before
competition. For these days, training should be reduced to a daily warm-up of
10 to 15 min of activity and accompanied by a carbohydrate-rich diet. Following
this plan, as seen in the figure below, glycogen
will be elevated to nearly 200 mmol/kg of muscle, the same level attained with
Astrand’s regimen, and the athlete will be better rested for competition.
It is possible to increase carbohydrate stores rapidly after even a very short
near-maximal-intensity bout of exercise. In a study of seven endurance
athletes, scientists found that cycling for 150s at 130% of VO2max followed by 30s of
all-out cycling and 24h of high-carbohydrate intake was sufficient to nearly
double muscle glycogen stores in just
one day.
Diet is also important in preparing the liver
for the demands of endurance exercise. Liver glycogen stores decrease rapidly
when a person is deprived of carbohydrates
for only 24h, even when at rest. With only 1h of strenuous exercise, liver
glycogen decreased by 55%. Thus, hard training combined with a low-carbohydrate
diet can empty the liver glycogen stores. A single carbohydrate meal, however, quickly restores liver glycogen to
normal. Clearly, a carbohydrate-rich diet in the days preceding competition
will maximize the liver glycogen reserve and minimize the risk of hypoglycemia
during the event.
Water is stored in the body at a rate of about
2.6g of water with each gram of glycogen. Consequently, an increase or decrease
in muscle and liver glycogen generally produces a change in the body weight of
from 0.5 to 1.4kg(1-3 lb). Some scientists have proposed monitoring of changes
in muscle and liver glycogen stores via recording the athlete’s early morning
weight immediately after rising – after emptying the bladder but before eating
breakfast. A sudden decrease in weight might reflect a failure to replaceglycogen, a deficit in body water, or both.
Athletes who must train or compete in
exhaustive events on successive days should replace muscle and liver glycogen stores as rapidly as possible. Although
liver glycogen can be depleted totally after 2h of exercise at 70% VO2max, it is replenished
within a few hours when a carbohydrate-rich meal is consumed. Muscle glycogen
resynthesis, on the other hand, is a slower process, taking several days to
return to normal after an exhaustive process bout such as the marathon(see
figure below). Studies in the late 1980s revealed that muscle glycogen resynthesis was most rapid when individuals were fed at least 50g(about 0.7g/kg
body weight) of glucose every 2h after the exercise. Feeding subjects more than
this amount did not appear to accelerate the replacement of muscle glycogen.
During the first 2h after exercise, the rate of muscle glycogen resynthesis is
much higher than later in recovery. Thus, an athlete recovering from an
exhaustive endurance event should ingest sufficient carbohydrate as soon after exercise as a practical. Addingprotein and amino acids to the carbohydrate
ingested during the recovery period enhances muscle glycogen resynthesis above
that achieved with carbohydrate
alone.
Normal body function depends on a balance
between water and electrolytes. When large amounts of water are lost from the
body, as during exercise, the balance between water and electrolytes can be
disrupted quickly. Our focus will be on the two major routes for electrolyte
loss: sweating and urine production.
Electrolyte loss in sweat
Human sweat is a filtrate of blood plasma, so
it contains many substances found there, including sodium(Na+),
chloride(Cl-), potassium(K+),
magnesium(Mg2+) and calcium(Ca2+). Although sweat
tastes salty, it contains far fewer minerals than the plasma and other body
fluids. In fact, sweat is 99% water.
Sodium and chloride are the predominant ions in
sweat and blood. As indicated in the
table below, the concentrations of sodium and chloride in sweat are about
one-third those found in plasma and five times those found in muscle. Each of
these three fluids’ osmolarity, which is the ratio of solutes(such as
electrolytes) to fluid, is also shown. Sweat’s electrolyte concentration can
vary considerably between individuals. It is strongly influenced by genetics,
the rate of sweating, the state of traiing, and the state of heat acclimatization.
Electrolyte
concentrations and osmolarity in sweat, plasma, and muscle of men following
2h of exercise in the heat
mEq/L = milliequivalents per liter(thousandths of
1g of solute per 1L of solvent), second column represents mEq/L of electrolytes
At the elevated rates of sweating reported
during endurance events, sweat contains large amounts of sodium and chloride
but little potassium, calcium andmagnesium. Based on estimates of the athlete’s total body
electrolyte content, such losses would lower the body’s sodium and chloride
content by only about 5% to 7%. Total body levels of potassium and magnesium,
two ions principally confined to the insides of cells, would decrease by about
1%. These losses probably have no measurable effect on an athlete’s
performance.
As electrolytes are lost in sweat, the
remaining ions are redistributed among the body tissues. Consider potassium. It diffuses from active
muscle fibers as they contract, entering the extracellular fluid. This increase
causes in extracellular potassium
levels that it does not equal the amount of potassium
that is released from active muscles, because potassiumis taken up by inactive muscles and other tissues while
the active muscles are losing it. During recovery, intracellular potassium levels normalize quickly. Some
researchers suggest that these muscle potassium
disturbances during exercise might contribute to fatique by altering the
membrane potentials of neurons and muscle fibers, makin it more difficult to
transmit impulses.
Electrolyte loss in urine
In addition to clearing wastes from the blood
and regulating water levels, the kidneys also regulate the body’s electrolyte
content. Urine production is the other major source of electrolyte loss. At
rest, electrolytes are excreted in the urine as necessary to maintain
homeostatic levels, and this is the primary route for electrolyte loss. But as
the body’s water loss increases during exercise, urine production rate decreases
considerably in an effort to conserve water. Consequently, with very little
urine being produced, electrolyte loss by this avenue is minimized.
The kidneys play another role in electrolyte
management. If, for example, a person eats 250 mEq of salt(NaCl), the kidneys
will normally excrete 250 mEq of these electrolytes to keep the body NaCl
content constant. Heavy sweating and dehydration,
however, trigger the release of the hormone aldosterone
from the adrenal gland. This hormone stimulates renal reabsorption of sodium.
Consequently, the body retains more sodium than usual during the hours and days
after a prolonged exercise bout. This elevates the body’s sodium content and
increases the osmolarity of the extracellular fluids.
This increased sodium content triggers thirst,
compelling the person to consume more water, which is then retained in the
extracellular compartment. The increased water consumption reestablishes normal
osmolarity in the extracellular fluids but leaves these fluids expanded, which dilutes
the other substances present there. This expansion of the extracellular fluids
has no negative effects and is temporary. In fact, this is one of the major
mechanisms for the increase in plasma volume that occurs with training and with
acclimatization to exercise in the heat.
Fluid levels return to normal within 48 to 72h after exercise, providing there
are no subsequent exercise bouts.
The body loses more water than electrolytes
during heavy sweating. This raises the osmotic pressure in the body fluids
because the electrolytes become more concentrated. The need to replace body
water is greater than the need for electrolytes because only by replenishing
water content can the electrolytes return to normal concentrations. But how
does the body know when this is necessary?
Thirst
When people feel thirsty, they drink. The
thirst sensation is regulated by the hypothalamus. It triggers thirst when the
plasma’s osmotic pressure is increased. Unfortunately, the body’s thirst mechanism doesn’t precisely
gauge its state of dehydration. It does not sense thirst until well after
dehydration begins. Even when dehydrated, people might desire fluids only at
intermittent intervals.
The control of thirst is not fully understood.
When permitted to drink water as their thirst dictates, people can require 24
to 48h to completely replace water lost through heavy sweating. In contrast,
dogs and burros can drink up to 10% of their total body weight within the first
few minutes after exercise or heat exposure, replacing all lost water. Because
of our sluggish drive to replace body water and to prevent chronic dehydration,
we are advised to drink more fluid than our thirst dictates. Because of the
increased water loss during exercise, it is imperative that athletes’ water
intake be sufficient to meet their bodies’ needs, and it is essential that they
rehydrate during and after an exercise bout.
Benefits of fluids during exercise
Drinking fluids during prolonged exercise,
especially in hot weather, has obvious benefits. Water intake will minimize
dehydration, increases in body temperature, cardiovascular stress, and declines
in performance. As seen in the figure below, when subjects became dehydrated
during several hours of treadmill running in the heat(40°C, or 104°F) without
fluid replacement, their heart rates increased steadily throughout the
exercise. When they were deprived of fluids, the subjects became exhausted and
couldn’t complete the 6h exercise. Ingesting either water or a saline solution
in amounts equal to weight loss prevented dehydration and kept subjects’ heart
rates lower. Even warm fluids(near body temperature) provide some protection
against overheating, but cold fluids enhance body cooling because some of the
deep body heat is used to warm cold drinks to body temperature.
Hyponatremia
Fluid replacement is beneficial, but too much
of a good thing could potentially be bad. In the 1980s, the first cases of
hyponatremia were reported in endurance athletes. Hyponatremia is clinically defined as a serum sodium concentration
below the normal range of 135 to 145 mmol/L. Symptoms of hyponatremia generally
appear when serum sodium levels drop below 130 mmol/L. Early signs and symptoms
include bloating, puffiness, nausea, vomiting, and headache. As the severity
increases, due to increasing cerebral edema(swelling of the brain), the
symptoms include confusion, disorientation, agitation, seizures, pulmonary
edema, coma, and death. How likely is hyponatremia to occur?
The processes that regulate fluid volumes and
electrolyte concentrations are highly effective, so consuming enough water to
dilute plasma electrolytes is difficult under normal circumstances. Marathoners
who lose 3 to 5 L of sweat and drink 2 to 3 L of water maintain normal plasma
concentrations of sodium, chloride, and potassium.
And distance runners who run 25 to 40 km(15.5-24.9 mi) per day in warm weather
and do not salt their food don’t develop electrolyte deficiencies.
Some research has suggested that during
ultramarathon running(more than 42 km, or 26.2 mi), athletes can experience
hyponatremia. A case study of two runners who collapsed after an ultramarathon
race(160km, or 100 mi) in 1983 revealed that their blood sodium concentrations had decreased from a normal value of
140 mmol/L to values of 123 and 118 mmol/L. One of the runners experienced a
grand mal seizure; the other became disoriented and confused. Examining the
runners’ fluid intakes and estimating their sodium intakes during the run
suggested that they had diluted their sodium contents by consuming too much
fluid that contained too little sodium.
The ideal resolution to prevent hyponatremia
would be to replace water at the exact rate at which it is being lost or to add
sodium to the ingested fluid. The problem with the latter approach is that the
most sport drinks contain no more than 25 mmol/L of sodium and are apparently
too weak to prevent sodium dilution alone, but very strong concentrations
cannot be tolerated. Exercise hyponatremia appears to be the result of a fluid
overload due to overconsumption, underreplacement of sodium losses, or both.
Only a small number of cases have been reported. Thus, it is probably
inappropriate to form conclusions from this information to design a fluid
replacement regimen for people who must exercise for long periods in the heat.
For optimal performance, the body’s water
content should remain relatively constant.
Water balance at rest
Under normal resting conditions, the body’s
water content is relatively constant: water intake equals water output. About
60% of our daily water intake is obtained from the fluids we drink and about
30% is from the food we consume. The remaining 10% is produced in our cells
during metabolism. Metabolic water production varies from 150 to 250 ml per
day, depending on the rate of energy expenditure: higher metabolic rates
produce more water. The total daily water intake from all sources averages
about 33ml per kilogram of body weight per day. For a 70kg(154lb) person,
average intake is 2.3L per day. Water output, or water loss, occurs from
four sources:
Evaporation from the skin;
Evaporation from the
respiratory tract;
Excretion from the kidneys;
Excretion from the large
intestine.
Human skin is permeable to water. Water
diffuses to the skin’s surface, where it evaporates into the environment. In
addition, the gases we breathe are constantly being humidified by water as they
pass through the respiratory tract. These two types of water loss(from the skin
and respiration) occur without our sensing them. Thus, they are termed
insensible water losses. Under cool, resting conditions, these losses account
for about 30% of daily water loss.
The majority of our daily water loss – 60% at
rest – occurs from our kidneys, which excrete water and waste products as
urine. Under resting conditions, the kidneys excrete about 50 to 60ml of water
per hour. Another 5% of the water is lost by sweating(although this is often
considered along with insensible water loss), and the remaining 5% is excreted
from the large intestine in the feces. The sources of water gain and water loss
are presented in the picture below.
Water balance during exercise
Water loss accelerates during exercise, as seen
in the table below. The ability to lose the heat generated during exercise
depends primarily on the formation and evaporation of sweat. As body
temperature increases, sweating increases in an effort to prevent overheating.
But at the same time, more water is produced during exercise because of
increased oxidative metabolism. Unfortunately, the amount produced even during
the most intense effort has only a small impact on the dehydration, or water loss, that results from heavy sweating.
In general, the amount of sweat produced during
exercise is determined by:
·Environmental temperature, radiant heat load,
humidity and air velocity;
·Body size;
·Metabolic rate.
These factors influence the body’s heat storage
and temperature. Heat is transferred from warmer areas to cooler ones, so heat
loss from the body is impaired by high environmental temperatures, radiation,
high humidity, and still air. Body size is important because large individuals
generally expend more energy to do a given task, so they typically have higher
metabolic rates and produce more heat. But they also have more surface
area(skin), which allows more sweat formation andevaporation. As exercise intensity increases, so does the metabolic
rate. This increases body heat production, which in turn increases sweating. To
conserve water during exercise, blood
flow to the kidneys decreases in an attempt to prevent dehydration; but like
the increase in metabolic water production, this too may be insufficient.
During high- intensity exercise under environmental heat stress, sweating and
respiratory evaporation can cause losses of as much as 2 to 3L of water per hour.
Dehydration and exercise performance
Even minimal changes in the body’s water
content can impair endurance performance. Without adequate fluid replacement,
an athlete’s exercise tolerance shows a pronounced decrease during long-term
activity because of water loss through sweating. The impact of dehydration on
the cardiovascular and thermoregulatory systems is quite
predictable. Fluid loss decreases plasma volume. This decreases blood pressure,
which in turn reduces bloodflowto
the muscles and skin. In an effort to overcome this,heart rate increases. Because less blood reaches the skin, heat
dissipation is hindered, and the body retains more heat. Thus, when a person is
dehydrated by 2% of body weight or more, both heart rate and body temperature are elevated during exercise above
values observed when normally hydrated.
As one might expect, these physiological
changes will decrease exercise performance. Figure below illustrates the
effects of an approximate 2% decrease in body weight attributable to dehydration
from the use of a diuretic on distance runners’ performance in 1500m, 5000m,
and 10,000m time trials on outdoor track. The dehydration condition resulted in
plasma volume decreases between 10% and 12%. Although the average VO2maxdid not differ between
the normally hydrated and dehydrated trials, mean running velocity decreased by
3% in the 1500m run and by more than 6% in the 5000m and 10,000m runs. The
greater the duration of the performance, the greater is the expected decline in
performance for the same degree of dehydration. These trials were conducted in
relatively cool weather. The higher the temperature, humidity, and radiation,
the greater the expected decrement in performance for the same degree of
dehydration. The decrement in performance would be progressively greater with
greater levels of dehydration.
The effect of dehydration on performance in
muscular strength, muscular endurance, and anaerobic types of activities is not
as clear. Decrements have been seen in some studies, whereas other studies have
shown no change in performance. In one of the best-controlled studies,
researchers at PennStateUniversity
reported that 2% dehydration resulted in significant deterioration of
basketball skills in 12- to 15-year-old boys who were skilled basketball
players.
Wrestlers and other weight-category athletes
commonly dehydrate to get a weight advantage during the weigh-in for a
competition. Most rehydrate after the weigh-in before the competition and
experience only small decrements in performance.
Tapering, by reducing the training stimulus, can
facilitate performance. What happens to highly conditioned athletes who have
fine-tuned their performance abilities to peak level but then come to the end
of their competitive season? Many athletes in team sports go into physical
hibernation at this time. Many have been working 2 to 5h each day to perfect
their skills and improve their physical condition, and they welcome the
opportunity to completely relax, purposely avoiding any strenuous physical
activity. But how does physical inactivity affect highly trained athletes?
Detraining is defined as the partial or complete loss of
training-induced adaptations in response to either the cessation of training or
a substantial decrement in the training load – in contrast totapering, which is a gradual reduction
of the peak training load over only a few days to a few weeks. Some of our
knowledge about physical detraining comes from clinical research with patients
who have been forced into inactivity because of injury or surgery. Athletes
generally agree that suffering the pain of an injury is bad enough, but the
situation is even worse when it forces them to stop training. Most fear that
all they have gained through hard training will be lost during a period of
inactivity. But recent studies reveal that a few days of rest or reduced
training will not impair and might even enhance performance, similar to what we
see with tapering. Yet at some point,
training reduction or complete inactivity will decrease physiological function
and performance.
Muscular strength and power
When a broken limb is immobilized in a rigid
cast, changes begin almost immediately in both the bone and the surrounding
muscles. Within only a few days, the cast that was applied tightly around the
injured limb is loose. After several weeks, a large space separates the cast
and the limb. Skeletal muscles undergo a substantial decrease in size, known as atrophy, when they remain inactive.
This is accompanied by considerable loss of muscular strength and power. Total
inactivity leads to rapid losses, but even prolonged periods of reduced
activity lead to gradual losses that eventually can become quite significant.
Similarly, research confirms that muscular
strength and power both are reduced once athletes stop training. The rate and
magnitude of loss appear to vary by the level of training. Highly skilled
accomplished weightlifters appear to have a rather rapid decline in strength
within a few weeks of discontinuing intense training. With previously untrained people, strength
gains can be maintained from several weeks up to over seven months. In a study
of young(20-30 years) and older(65-75 years) men and women who trained for nine
weeks, the increase in strength(1-repetition maximum) averaged 34% for the
younger subjects and 28% for the older subjects, with no differences between
men and women. After 12 weeks of detraining, none of the four groups had
significant losses in strength from the end of the nine-week training program
values. After 31 weeks of detraining, there was only an 8% loss in the younger
subjects and a 13% decrease in the older subjects.
A study with collegiate swimmers revealed that
even with up to four weeks of inactivity, terminating training did
not affect arm or shoulder strength. No strength changes were seen in these
swimmers, whether they spent four weeks at complete rest or whether they
reduced their training frequency to one or three sessions per week. But
swimming power was reduced by 8% to 13.5% during the four weeks of reduced
activity, whether the swimmers underwent complete rest or merely reduced
training frequency. Although muscular strength might not havediminished during the four weeks of rest or
reduced training, the swimmers might have lost their ability to apply force
during swimming, possibly attributable to a loss of skill.
The physiological mechanisms responsible for
the loss of muscular strength as a consequence of either immobilization or
inactivity are not clearly understood. Muscle atrophy causes a noticeable decrease in muscle mass and water content,
which could party account for a loss in the development of maximal muscle fiber
tension. Changes occur in the rates of protein
synthesis and degradation as well as in specific fiber type characteristics.
When muscles aren’t used, the frequency of their neurological stimulation is
reduced, and normal fiber recruitmentis
disrupted. Thus, part of the strength loss associated with detraining could
result from an inability to activate some muscle fibers.
The retention of muscular strength, power, and
size is extremely important for the injured athlete. The athlete can save much
time and effort during rehabilitation by performing even a low level of
exercise with the injured limb, starting in the first few days of recovery.
Simple isometric contractions are very effective for rehabilitation because
their intensity can be graded and they do not require joint movement. Any
program of rehabilitation, however, must be designed in cooperation with the
supervising physician and physical therapist.
Muscular endurance
Muscular endurance performance decreases alter
only two weeks of inactivity. At this time, not enough evidence is available to
determine whether this performance decrement results from changes in cardiovascular
capacity. In this section, we
examine muscle changes that are known to accompany detraining and that could
decrease muscular endurance.
The localized muscle adaptations that occur
during periods of inactivity are well documented, but knowledge of the exact
role that these changes play in the loss of muscular endurance still eludes us.
We know that from postsurgery cases that after a week or two of cast
immobilization, the activities of oxidative enzymes such as succinate
dehydrogenase(SDH) and cytochrome oxidase decrease by 40% to 60%. Data
collected from swimmers, shown in the figure below, indicate that the muscles’
oxidative potential decreases much more rapidly than the subjects’ maximal
oxygen uptake with detraining. Reduced oxidative enzyme activity would be
expected to impair muscular endurance, and this most likely relates to
submaximal endurance capacity rather than to maximal aerobic capacity, or VO2max.
In contrast, when athletes stop training, the
activities of their muscles’ glycolitic enzymes, such as phosphorylase and
phosphofructokinase, change little, if at all, for at least four weeks. In
fact, Coyle and colleagues’ observed no change in glycolytic enzyme activities
with up to 84 days of detraining compared with a nearly 60% decrease in the
activities of various oxidative enzymes. This might at least partly explain why
performance times in sprint events are unaffected by a month or more of
inactivity, but the ability to perform longer endurance events may decrease
significantly with as little as two weeks of detraining.
One notable change in the muscle during
detraining is a change in its glycogen
content. Endurance-trained muscle tends to increase its glycogen storage.
But four weeks of detraining has been shown to decrease muscle glycogen by 40%. Figure below illustrates the decrease in
muscle glycogen content after four weeks of inactivity, but the swimmers’
values decreased until they were about equal to those of the untrained people.
This indicates that the trained swimmers’ improved capacity for muscle glycogen
storage was reversed during detraining.
Measurements of blood lactate and pH
after a standard work bout have been used to assess the physiological changes
that accompany training and detraining. For example, a group of collegiate
swimmers were required to perform a standard-paced, 200 yd(183 m) swim at 90%
of their seasonal best following five months of training and then to repeat
this test at the same absolute pace once a week for the following four weeks of
detraining. The results are shown in the table below. Blood lactate
concentrations, taken immediately after this standard swim, increased from week
to week during a month of inactivity. At the end of the fourth week of
detraining, the swimmers’ acid-base balance was significantly disturbed. This
was reflected by a significant increase in blood lactate concentrations and a
significant decrease in the concentrations of bicarbonate(a buffer).
Blood
lactate, pH, and bicarbonate(HCO3-) values in
collegiate swimmers undergoind detraining
Weeks
of detraining
Measurement
0
1
2
4
Lactate(mmol/L)
4.2
6.3
6.8
9.7
pH
7.26
7.24
7.24
7.18
HCO3-
(mmol/L)
21.1
19.5
16.1
16.3
Swim
time(s)
130.6
130.1
130.5
130.0
Speed, agility, and flexibility
Training produces less improvement in speed and
agility than it does in strength, power, muscular endurance, flexibility and
cardiorespiratory endurance. Consequently, losses of speed and agility that
occur with inactivity are relatively small. Also, peak levels of both can be
maintained with a limited amount of training. But this does not imply that the
track sprinter can get by with training only a few days a week. Success in
actual competition relies on factors other than basic speed and agility, such
as correct form, skill, and the ability to generate a strong finishing sprint.
Many hours of practice are required to tune performance to its optimal level,
but most of this time is spent developing performance qualities other than
speed and agility.
Flexibility, on the other hand, is lost rather
quickly during inactivity. Stretching exercises should be incorporated into
both in-season and off-season training programs. Reduced flexibility has been
proposed to increase athletes’ susceptibility to serious injury.
Cardiorespiratory endurance
The heart,
like other muscles in the body, is strengthened by endurance training.
Inactivity, on the other hand, can substantially decondition theheart and the cardiovascular system. The most dramatic example of this is seen in
a study conducted on subjects undergoing long periods of total bed rest; they
weren’t allowed to leave their beds, and physical activity was kept to an
absolute minimum. Cardiovascular and metabolic function were assessed at a
constant submaximal rate of work and at maximal rates of work both before and
after the 20-day period of bed rest. The cardiovascular effects that
accompanied bed rest included:
The reductions in cardiac output and VO2max appear to result from reduced stroke volume; this appears to be largely attributable to a decreased plasma
volume, with reductions in heart volume and ventricular contractility playing a
smaller role.
It is interesting that the two most highly
conditioned subjects in the study(the two who had the highest VO2maxvalues)
experienced greater decrements inVO2max than the three less fit people, as
shown in the figure below. Furthermore, the untrained subjects regained their
initial conditioning levels(before bed rest) in the first 10 days of
reconditioning, but the well-trained subjects needed about 40 days for full
recovery. This suggests that highly trained individuals cannot afford long
periods with little or no endurance training. The athlete who totally abstains
from endurance training at the completion of the season will experience great
difficulty getting back into top aerobic condition when the new season begins.
Inactivity can significantly reduce VO2max. How much activity is
needed to prevent such considerable losses of physical conditioning? Although a
decrease in training frequency and duration reduces aerobic capacity, the losses are significant only when frequency
and duration reduces aerobic capacity, thee losses are significant only when
frequency and duration are reduced by two-thirds of the regular training load.
However, training intensity apparently plays a more crucial role in maintaining
aerobic power during periods of reduced training. Training at 70% VO2max appears to be
necessary to maintain maximal aerobic capacity.
1) Nadji Slovak pod poljem Dynamic translation.
2) Sacekati da ucita prevod.
3) Ponovo aktivirati padajuci meni, Serbian ce se pojaviti tacno iznadSlovak.
4) Kliknuti na Serbian.
All of our methods and training programs are based on scientific researches and confirmations! We follow the science! We follow the latest methods and trends! We adjust programs according to our players bio, conditions, requests, needs, progression. We always make a deal. We never do the same type of training for all the players.